 |
PROPOSITIONS 1A & 1B
If Seattle had Approval Voting in the 2021 election, Ann Davison would not be our current city attorney. In that year’s primary, a liberal (Nicole Thomas-Kennedy), a conservative (Davison) and a moderate (Pete Holmes) faced off to see which two would advance to the general election. The liberal got 36% of the vote and the conservative got 33%, leaving the moderate out of the running with just 31%.
The liberals hated the conservative candidate and the conservatives hated the liberal candidate, and had voters been allowed to hedge their bet and vote for ANY AND ALL candidates they “approve of,” Pete Holmes would’ve been everyone’s other choice, meaning he would’ve actually won the primary, advanced to the general election and undoubtedly defeated whichever candidate he’d have faced.
Ranked Choice Voting would not likely have produced the same outcome, because Davison and Thomas-Kennedy would still have been the top choices on the most ballots, eliminating Holmes right away, and allowing the same two candidates to face each other in the general election.
Both Approval Voting and Ranked Choice Voting seem a little gimmicky, but sometimes gimmicks work, and this real-world example (keeping very flawed candidates like Ann Davison out of office) is enough for me to want to give it a try.
VOTE YES & VOTE PROPOSITION 1A |